| Please visit our ***NEW*** OBF/BOSC website: https://www.open-bio.org/ |
-
Difference between revisions of "SolutionChallenge"
(Initial solution challenge page) |
m (→Guidelines) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
== Guidelines == | == Guidelines == | ||
| − | * The goal is to pick a challenging problem that demonstrates the utility of a bioinformatics approach to answering the question, | + | * The goal is to pick a challenging problem that demonstrates the utility of a bioinformatics approach to answering the question, not necessarily an unsolved problem like the [http://www.netflixprize.com/ Netflix Prize]. |
| − | not necessarily an unsolved problem like the [http://www.netflixprize.com/ Netflix Prize]. | ||
| − | * Feel free to use any publicly available programs and libraries in solving the problem. If you are solving a problem in Python, | + | * Feel free to use any publicly available programs and libraries in solving the problem. If you are solving a problem in Python, we certainly want to see how the language and toolkits help you do that most efficiently, but re-writing BLAST in Python makes no sense. How you integrate the external programs into your automated analysis pipeline is of extreme interest. |
| − | we certainly want to see how the language and toolkits help you do that most efficiently, but re-writing BLAST in Python makes no sense. How you | ||
| − | integrate the external programs into your automated analysis pipeline is of extreme interest. | ||
| − | * We can select from one overall challenge or a panel of challenges. We'd like to provide some overlap to help compare and contrast various approaches, | + | * We can select from one overall challenge or a panel of challenges. We'd like to provide some overlap to help compare and contrast various approaches, but some challenges may fit better with a focus of a toolkit then others. |
| − | but some challenges may fit better with a focus of a toolkit then others. | ||
* The winner will be selected by conference participants; everyone who sees your talk gets a vote. The criteria conference attendees should vote on are: | * The winner will be selected by conference participants; everyone who sees your talk gets a vote. The criteria conference attendees should vote on are: | ||
| − | |||
* Execution of the analysis. How easy is it to understand and replicate? | * Execution of the analysis. How easy is it to understand and replicate? | ||
* Quality of the answer. What interesting biological was discovered? | * Quality of the answer. What interesting biological was discovered? | ||
Revision as of 13:40, 18 February 2010
Contents
OpenBio solution challenge: Project updates at BOSC 2010
One of the traditional items we've had at the conference is project updates from open source bioinformatics libraries, like BioPerl, BioJava, Biopython, BioRuby and EMBOSS. This year, we're planning to organize these talks around a central theme: the OpenBio solution challenge. We start with a biological question of general interest, and project talks focus around how you would solve that problem using your toolkit and programming language.
This is meant to provide a challenge for OpenBio contributors, a nice tutorial style overview of various projects and approaches for other programmers, and a fun opportunity to compete and learn from other projects. Conference attendees will vote on their favorite solution, with the winner receiving fame and fortune (warning: fortune not guaranteed).
The challenge is open to any interested participants. Please submit an abstract for BOSC with information about your project and that you are interested in participating in the solution challenge session. Introduce yourself and your ideas on the Open Bio mailing list as well.
Guidelines
- The goal is to pick a challenging problem that demonstrates the utility of a bioinformatics approach to answering the question, not necessarily an unsolved problem like the Netflix Prize.
- Feel free to use any publicly available programs and libraries in solving the problem. If you are solving a problem in Python, we certainly want to see how the language and toolkits help you do that most efficiently, but re-writing BLAST in Python makes no sense. How you integrate the external programs into your automated analysis pipeline is of extreme interest.
- We can select from one overall challenge or a panel of challenges. We'd like to provide some overlap to help compare and contrast various approaches, but some challenges may fit better with a focus of a toolkit then others.
- The winner will be selected by conference participants; everyone who sees your talk gets a vote. The criteria conference attendees should vote on are:
* Execution of the analysis. How easy is it to understand and replicate? * Quality of the answer. What interesting biological was discovered? * Uniqueness of the approach. What elements of the toolkit make it useful for the problem?
Project ideas
These are collected project ideas from various members. Please create a wiki account and add your own. As a group we will decide on one or more challenges to use:
- Drosophila RNA-seq gender analysis
Discussion
Your thoughts and project ideas are very welcome. Please use the open bio mailing list as a central point of discussion: open-bio-l@lists.open-bio.org
